MM Presidential Indicator Wins!

This may seem like old news, but it's a win today for the MM Indicator...

Because the MM Electability Indicator is 5 days lagging the social mood data, we developed the Campaign Momentum Indicator to try to get around this (i.e. the momentum of the Electability Indicator).  It was found that using an adaptation of Elliott Wave analysis, it was possible to make an educated guess about what was coming next in momentum, as the changes in the CMI seemed to follow clear Elliott Wave patterns.  This worked well for the debates.  A few weeks prior to the election it looked like a 3rd wave was about to take place.  However, we gave this caveat:  "If this is a correct assessment, this would mean that there should not be a last minute bounce for Trump nor a last minute fall for Clinton.  These would be impulsive structures, and the campaigns would be both at juggernaut momentum in their respective directions coming into the close."

Shortly after this, the Comey FBI announcement came out which dramatically altered the Clinton campaign momentum.  This gave us pause, but we waited until the day of the election to give a final call.  At that point, a clear 3rd wave could not be seen, but there was still a good chance that one was "trying to."  We gave Clinton a 60-75% chance of winning at that point, and had to admit that it was much less a sure thing, as the wave pattern no longer looked like a clear impulsive Clinton wave.  Also, competing with the CMI, was that the Electability Indicator was clearly showing Trump as "trying" to have an impulsive 3rd wave up (1-2 i-ii in place).

Today's social mood data, due to the lag in the Electability Indicator, brings us to Nov. 8th.  The final results give Clinton a 33.0% and Trump a 32.7% in a national election (see below).  While this does not take the electoral college into account, this is a great reflection of the close race and Clinton narrowly winning the popular vote.  It also shows how timing is everything.  A few weeks prior, Trump would have won in a landslide.  Just a few days later, we might now have a president Clinton.

Calling the Presidential Election

The social mood signals we use give us information about the markets several days ahead.  We've developed a polling indicator, and while tracking well, gives info that is about a week old.  We found a way around this impediment buy using the momentum of projected polling changes.  By combining the Campaign Momentum Indicator and an adaptation of Elliott Wave analysis we were able to obtain useful information before the 1st and 2nd presidential debates (we abstained from the 3rd).  Today is election day, and while leaning in a direction, we have to admit that the alternative has not been ruled out.

The base case outlook is that Trump is in a 3rd wave down and Clinton in a 3rd wave up, and that each is about to experience a 3rd of a 3rd in their particular direction.  For those not familiar with Elliott Waves, this means a really big blast in that direction-- the grand finale.  However, the way this has played out has left it somewhat ambiguous, and leaves a less probable, but not unlikely possibility that Trump has completed a c wave and beginning a new uptrend, and Clinton would be in a similar situation (not shown on chart).  It looks cleaner (to me) with the 1-2 i-ii count, ready to blast into a 3rd of 3rd.  However, I won't know for another week how this chart actually played out for election day.

Final call: Clinton winning is most probable, but not clear cut certain.

2nd Presidential Debate: Trump's Comeback?

The first debate was easy to call.  We were able to use our Campaign Momentum Indicator and an adaptation of Elliott Wave analysis to see that the debate would mark a peak for Trump and a low for Hillary.  Since that day, the Trump campaign has taken a dive, and Clinton has had a relatively easy time of it.

For this debate, there is no easily identifiable Elliott Wave "abc" pattern to tell us the next move in each candidate's campaign momentum.  Without that available, we will simply have to look at the current momentum reading and infer what that might imply about tonight's debate.  Hopefully, by the 3rd debate, and especially by the election a clearer pattern will be emerging.

While the last couple of weeks has been quite bad for Trump, the CMI shows at least a pause of this decline, and even perhaps a mild rebound.  The indication would be that he should do better than expected in this debate, and possibly make some people reconsider supporting him who had been turned off of late.  Clinton's campaign momentum is near zero.  The expectation is for her to hold her own and not really change many minds for or against her.

Social Mood Clues to Monday's Debate

For several weeks now, we've been looking at the idea of Presidential Campaign technical analysis using a social mood derived Campaign Momentum Indicator and an adaptation of Elliott Wave analysis.  Our last prediction was that Trump would see a gain in the polls and Clinton a drop (which we have been seeing).  Both campaigns have been following a "corrective" structure of some type, and this most recent "c" wave or 5 wave move in each campaign should signal a completion of that direction.

What this means is that Trump is likely at a peak in gaining poll points and Clinton at a low in losing poll points.  If this is the case, then it would make sense for Clinton to win the upcoming debate on Monday in the eyes of most voters. However, because we haven't yet seen evidence that either of these "c waves" have climaxed (i.e. begin to turn in the other direction), the debate may be Trump's final triumph, and Hillary's last big stumble just before things turn around.  Let's see what happens.

Presidential Pins and Needles

I've been discussing "Presidential Technical Analysis" over the past few weeks, and we've been combining a social mood derived Campaign Momentum Indicator and an adaptation of Elliott Wave Analysis.  I've been doing a weekly update on this on Sundays, but this just can't wait!
As of the last post, we were wondering whether Trump was experiencing a corrective increase in momentum (as informed by social mood data), or whether his new uptrend would be impulsive and give him an almost guaranteed victory.  It looks pretty clear at this point, that this uptrend is corrective, and will not yield a default victory crown.

However, the surprising new development is what is going on with the Clinton campaign trajectory (see chart below).  We expected her to have a tough week or two with a sharp "c wave" drop coming up for her.  Yet, the rebound from that sharp drop is only three waves so far.   A critical moment is just ahead!  Either she will get one more upward move soon, giving her five waves up and a new surge in momentum, or her entire campaign is about to "crash" in what would be a devastating not yet completed c wave down that could last well into October.  It wouldn't be impossible, but it would be nearly so, to recover from such a devastating blow in time for a win in November.
Stay tuned!

MarketMood, Elliott Waves, and the Election

Last week I introduced a Presidential Campaign Momentum chart (link).  One thing that came from the discussion was a recognition of Elliott Wave patterns in this social mood derived chart.  A "b wave top" was spotted for the trajectory of Clinton's campaign and a "c wave low" for Trump.  From this labeling (shown below) we expected the next wave for Clinton to be 5 waves down.  For Trump, an up move was expected next with possibly the entire election hinging on whether the next wave set for him is a 3 wave corrective move up or a 5 wave impulsive one.  A 5 wave move up for Trump would be just the beginning of a new strong surge in the polls.

It is fascinating that we were able to call the direction of the next wave set using this combination of Elliott Waves and the MarketMood social mood data.  You have the exclusive information here that the entire presidential election could very well rest on the next week or two.  That is, not what the candidates do or say in the next week or two, but what the pattern is in the social mood data.
Looking at our momentum chart, Clinton has 3 waves down so far, and Trump 3 waves up.  They are both on a possible wave 4.  The sharp drop for Clinton does appear right for a 5 wave drop.  Today's health news could end up being a part of the 5th wave.  Trump's rally so far has more of a corrective look to it, but we will have to wait a few more days to clearly see if he is working on a 5th wave up, or beginning another 3 wave drop down.

Presidential Technical Analysis

Just for the sake of this discussion, leave the fundamental analysis (and personal opinions about the candidates' character) at the door.  What if these were two stocks you were considering trading, and all you had was this momentum indicator?  What I see is a series of lower highs for Clinton, with current momentum at 0.  I would wait before buying this one.  The Trump stock is clearly more volatile, and the previous high was a higher high.  I would watch this one carefully for the next turn up in momentum.  However, at this point I would have to stand aside on both of them.  What would you do with these "stocks?"